The Concept of Electronic-Based THIS Planning in the Ministry of Transportation

Abstract

Synchronization of planning and budgeting is a common problem that is often experienced by public organizations in Indonesia, especially in the Ministry of Transportation. The gap in planning and implementation due to this problem is a symptom that the THIS (Thematic, Holistic, Integrative, Spatial) concept has not been able to run optimally and could be optimized through e-government, which does actually not yet reflect the interoperability aspects between each planning application such as e-planning & budgeting; e-performance; e-monitoring & reporting; up to ap2kp (Aplication for Appraisal of Achievement and Calculation of Empoyee Performance). This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study method strengthened by an Analytical Hierarchy Process to examine the application of the electronic-based THIS concept. The results of this study provide policy advices for the preparation of a new ministerial regulation about integrated planning and develop a business process related to the planning flow within the Ministry of Transportation which accommodates the THIS concept.

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(4), 543-571.
Bastian, I. (2006). Sistem akuntansi sektor publik (2 ed.). Penerbit Salemba Empat.
Blazely, A. (2018). OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting.
Cholifah, C. (2013). Rancangan Model Efektivitas Penggunaan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja Dinas Pendapatan Daerah Provinsi Jawa Timur. Wiga: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ekonomi, 3(2), 20-30.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Davison, R. M., Wagner, C., & Ma, L. C. (2005). From government to e‐government: a transition model. Information Technology and People, 18(3), 280-299. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840510615888
De Jong, M., van Beek, I., & Posthumus, R. (2013). Introducing accountable budgeting: lessons from a decade of performance-based budgeting in the Netherlands. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 12(3), 1-34.
Denzin, K. N., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2010). Handbook Of Qualitative Research. Pustaka Pelajar.
Dunn, W. N. (2017). Public policy analysis: An integrated approach. Routledge.
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of public administration research and theory, 22(1), 1-29.
Fadillah, A. Y., Aziza, N., & Martiah, L. (2020). Pengaruh Sinkronisasi Perencanaan dan Penganggaran, Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia dan Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Bengkulu Tengah. JURNAL FAIRNESS, 10(1), 63-78.
Government regulation 17 of 2017 concerning synchronization of the national development planning and budgeting process, (2017). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/51467/pp-no-17-tahun-2017
Haq, A. (2014). Perencanaan strategis dalam perspektif organisasi. Jurnal INTEKNA: Informasi Teknik dan Niaga, 14(2).
Hodgkinson, S. (2002). Managing an e-government transformation program. Working Towards Whole-of-Government Online Conference, Canberra, September,
Jumame, S. T., Karamoy, H., & Poputra, A. T. (2015). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penyusunan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah Berbasis Kinerja di Pemerintah Kota Sorong. JURNAL RISET AKUNTANSI DAN AUDITING" GOODWILL", 6(2).
Komariah, Y. (2020). Perencanaan Strategis (Renstra) di Sektor Publik. Jurnal Wacana Kinerja: Kajian Praktis-Akademis Kinerja dan Administrasi Pelayanan Publik, 5(1), 35-41.
Kurniawan, T. (2019). The cultural transformation of Government Spending Through Money Follow Program Budget Planning for The Allocation of Village Funding. The First International Conference On Islamic Development Studies 2019, ICIDS 2019, 10 September 2019, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia,
Last, M. D. P., & Robinson, M. M. (2009). A basic model of performance-based budgeting.
Mubar, N. R. (2013). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penyusunan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah Berbasi Kinerja (Studi pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Enrekang) Universitas Hassanuddin].
Muryati. (2015). Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi, Sistem Administrasi, Sumberdaya, Penghargaan, Sanksi, dan Motivasi Terhadap Penyusunan APBD Berbasis Kinerja di Kabupaten Batanghari. Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Unja, 1(2).
Permatasari, A. (2017). Analisa konsep perencanaan strategis. Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Administrasi, 11(2).
Prideaux, B. (2000). The role of the transport system in destination development. Tourism management, 21(1), 53-63.
Puspitasari, R. (2013). Studi Penganggaran Berbasis Kinerja pada Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Timur, Jawa Barat dan DKI Jakarta. Jejaring Administrasi Publik, 5(2), 356-369.
Siagian, A. (2014). Perencanaan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja dalam upaya Meningkatkan Capaian Kinerja. Jurnal Jejaring Administrasi Publik, 4(2), 488-495.
Sulistio, E. B. (2010). Proses Penyusunan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja (Studi Pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Way Kanan). Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan, 1(1), 39-49.
Sullivan, C. (2016). Performance-based Budgeting. Research Department, Minnesota House of Representatives.
Umar, H. (2004). Metode Riset Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Pembangunan, dan Niaga. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Wasono, A., & Maulana, M. (2018). Tinjauan Kritis Perencanaan dan Penganggaran Pembangunan di Indonesia. Laporan Hasil Penelitian, Working Paper, 27.
Winarni, E., Ahmad, A. A., & Suharno, S. (2021). Community Participation of Development Planning in Purbalingga Regency. ICORE, 5(1).
Yulia, A., & Ningsih, E. S. (2020). Penerapan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja (Performance Based Budgeting) Dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi, 5(1), 50-58.
Zinyama, T., & Nhema, A. G. (2016). Zimbabwe performance-based budgeting: Concepts and success factors. Public Policy and Administration Review, 4(1), 33-60.