Business Model Innovation in Research and Development: State of the Art and Based on Public Needs

Abstract

Every institution has business models, but some are not properly realized to benefit and meet the public needs. The aim of the study was to improve the government's existing business models in space technology to meet the public needs. Related studies regarding the issues were reviewed, and personal observation was conducted at the government space institution in Indonesia. The study found that to attain the public needs, the development of the business model in space technology should consider four aspects, research and development expenditures, wellbeing, sustainable cities and communities, and adoption of emerging technologies. Incorporating the four aspects into the existing business model is expected to bring the research and development closer to what the public wants.

References

1. Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., & Airaksinen, M. (2017). What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?. Cities, 60, 234-245.
2. Alizadeh, P., Ghazinoory, S., & Amiri, M. (2018). Designing a Policy Mix to Enhance the Business Expenditure on Research and Development (R&D) in Iran.
3. Aluchna, M., & Rok, B. (2018). Sustainable business models: The case of the collaborative economy. In Sustainable business models (pp. 41-62). Springer, Cham.
4. Alusi, A., Eccles, R. G., Edmondson, A. C., & Zuzul, T. (2011). Sustainable cities: oxymoron or the shape of the future?. Harvard Business School Organizational Behavior Unit Working Paper, (11-062), 11-062.
5. Bai, X., Surveyer, A., Elmqvist, T., Gatzweiler, F. W., Güneralp, B., Parnell, S., ... & Webb, R. (2016). Defining and advancing a systems approach for sustainable cities. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 23, 69-78.
6. Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 8(1), 9-32.
7. Beekhuyzen, J., Hellens, L. V., & Siedle, M. (2005, July). Cultural barriers in the adoption of emerging technologies. In Proceedings of HCI International.
8. Campbell, D. F., & Guttel, W. H. (2005). Knowledge production of firms: research networks and the" scientification" of business R&D. International Journal of Technology Management, 31(1-2), 152-175.
9. Charutawephonnukoon, P., Jermsittiparsert, K., & Chienwattanasook, K. (2021). Impact Of High Technology Exports, Patent Applications And Research And Development Expenditure On Economic Growth: Evidence From Asean Countries. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(2), 1956-1972.
10. Cheng, K. C., & Chen, K. K. (2011). The impact of myopic loss aversion on continuing a troubled research and development expenditure. African Journal of Business Management, 5(6), 2048-2054.
11. Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43, 2/3, 354–363.
12. Chesbrough, H. (2007). Business model innovation: it's not just about technology anymore. Strategy & leadership.
13. Chesbrough, H. W. (2007). Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan management review, 48(2), 22.
14. Clarke, R. Y. (2017). Measuring success in the development of smart and sustainable cities. In Managing for Social Impact (pp. 239-254). Springer, Cham.
15. Cloutier, S., Larson, L., & Jambeck, J. (2014). Are sustainable cities “happy” cities? Associations between sustainable development and human well-being in urban areas of the United States. Environment, development and sustainability, 16(3), 633-647.
16. Coccia, M. (2008a) ‘Investimento pubblico e privato in R&S: complementarietà ed interazione con la crescita della produttività’, Economia e Politica Industriale, 34, 3, pp.127–54.
17. Coccia, M. (2011). The interaction between public and private R&D expenditure and national productivity. Prometheus, 29(2), 121-130.
18. David, P., Hall, B. and Toole, A. (2000) ‘Is public R&D a complement or a substitute for private R&D? A review of the economic evidence’, Research Policy, 29, 4-5, pp.497–529.
19. Demil, B. and Lecocq, X. (2010) Business model evolution: in search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Planning, 43, 2/3, 227–246.
20. Dodge, R., Daly, A. P., Huyton, J., & Sanders, L. D. (2012). The challenge of defining wellbeing. International journal of wellbeing, 2(3).
21. Ejiaku, S. A. (2014). Technology adoption: Issues and challenges in information technology adoption in emerging economies. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 23(2), 5.
22. Engel, D., Rothgang, M., & Eckl, V. (2016). Systemic aspects of R&D policy subsidies for R&D collaborations and their effects on private R&D. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 206-222.
23. European Commission (2012). Communication from the commission. Smart cities and communities – European innovation partnership. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/ technology/initiatives/doc/2012_4701_smart_cities_en.pdf (accessed 10.2.2016)
24. Falk, M. (2004). What drives business R&D intensity across OECD countries? (No. 236). WIFO Working Papers.
25. Falk, M. (2006). What drives business Research and Development (R&D) intensity across Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries?. Applied Economics, 38(5), 533-547.
26. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of public economics, 89(5-6), 997-1019.
27. Gambardella, A., & McGahan, A. M. (2010). Business-model innovation: General purpose technologies and their implications for industry structure. Long range planning, 43(2-3), 262-271.
28. George, G. and Bock, A. (2011) The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 35, 1, 83–111.
29. Gil-Garcia, J. R., Helbig, N., & Ojo, A. (2014). Being smart: Emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector. Government information quarterly, 31, I1-I8.
30. Guellec, D. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2003) ‘The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12, 3, pp.225–44.
31. Hill, R. (1969) ‘The improvement of returns from R&D industries’ in Hugh-Jones, E.M. (ed.) Economics and Technical Change, Kelley, New York.
32. Harker, D. & Van Akkeren, J. (2002) Exploring the needs of SMEs for mobile data technologies: the role of qualitative research techniques, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, June 2002, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 199-209(11).
33. Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Keyes, C. L. (2003). Well-being in the workplace and its relationship to business outcomes: A review of the Gallup studies.
34. https://networkreadinessindex.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/NRI-2020-V8_28-11-2020.pdf, access on August 16th 2021, at 12:22 WIB.
35. Höjer, M., & Wangel, J. (2015). Smart sustainable cities: definition and challenges. In ICT innovations for sustainability (pp. 333-349). Springer, Cham.
36. Huňady, J., and Pisár, P. (2021). Innovation and invention in the EU business sector: the role of the R&D expenditures. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems: INDECS, 19(2), 168-188.
37. Kamoun, F. (2008). Rethinking the business model with RFID. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 22(1), 35.
38. Karimi, J. and Walter, Z. (2016), “Corporate entrepreneurship, disruptive business model innovation adoption, and its performance: the case of the newspaper industry”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 49 No. 3, pp. 342-360.
39. Komninos, N., Bratsas, C., Kakderi, C., & Tsarchopoulos, P. (2016). Smart city ontologies: Improving the effectiveness of smart city applications. Journal of Smart Cities (Transferred), 1(1).
40. La Guardia, J. G., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: a self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 79(3), 367.
41. Leichenko R. (2011). Climate change and urban resilience. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2011, 3:164-168.
42. MacGregor R.C., Bunker D.J. & Waugh P. (1998) Electronic Commerce and Small/Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Australia: An Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) Pilot Study, Proceedings of the 11th International Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, Slovenia, June
43. McPhearson T, Pickett STA, Grimm NB, Niemela¨ J, Alberti M, Elmqvist T, Weber C, Haase D, Breuste J, Qureshi S. (2016). Advancing urban ecology toward a science of cities. BioScience 2016, 66:198-212.
44. Mejias, R. J., Shepherd, M. M., Vogel, D. R. and Lazaneo, L. (1997) Consensus and Perceived Satisfaction Levels: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of GSS and Non-GSS Outcomes within and between the United States and Mexico, Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, 137-161.
45. Midterm Planning Document of LAPAN 2020-2024. (2020).
46. Mina, A., Bascavusoglu-Moreau, E., & Hughes, A. (2014). Open service innovation and the firm's search for external knowledge. Research policy, 43(5), 853-866.
47. Morris, M., Schindehutte, M.H., and Allen, J. (2005) The entrepreneur’s business model: toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58, 6, 726– 735.
48. Newman, G., Wiggins, A., Crall, A., Graham, E., Newman, S., & Crowston, K. (2012). The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 298-304.
49. Ordonez-Ponce, E., Clarke, A. C., & Colbert, B. A. (2021). Collaborative sustainable business models: Understanding organizations partnering for community sustainability. Business & Society, 60(5), 1174-1215.
50. Perkmann, M. and Spicer, A. (2010) What are business models? Developing a theory of performative representation. In: Lounsbury, M. (ed.), Technology and Organization: Essays in Honour of Joan Woodward. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group. pp. 265–275.
51. Pratistha, B. (2018). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Akankah Mendukung Penerapan Teknologi Keantariksaan?. Buletin LAPAN, 5(2).
52. Pratistha, B. (2019). Kerangka Kerja Konseptual: Model Kolaborasi Menuju Ekonomi Berbasis Pengetahuan Teknologi Keantariksaan (Conceptual Framework: Collaboration Model For Space Technology Knowledge Based Economy). Majalah Sains dan Teknologi Dirgantara, 14(1).
53. Sharma, A., & Khanna, P. (2020). Relevance of adopting emerging technologies in outbound supply chain: new paradigm for cement industry. Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(2), 210-221.
54. Schiavi, G. S., & Behr, A. (2018). Emerging technologies and new business models: a review on disruptive business models. Innovation & Management Review.
55. Schneider, S. and Spieth, P. (2013) Business model innovation: towards an integrated future research agenda. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17, 1, 1340001-1-1340001-34. doi: 10.1142/S1363919613 40001X.
56. Scupola, A (2003) The Adoption of Internet Commerce by SMEs in the South of Italy: An Environmental, Technological and Organizational Perspective, Journal of Global Information Technology Management, No. 6, Vol. 1, 2003.
57. Spieth, P., Schneckenberg, D., and Ricart, J. E. (2014). Business model innovation–state of the art and future challenges for the field.
58. Steers, R. M., Meyer, A. D., and Sanchez-Runde, C. J. (2008). National culture and the adoption of new technologies. Journal of World Business, 43(3), 255-260.
59. Stratigea, A., Leka, A., and Panagiotopoulou, M. (2019). In search of indicators for assessing smart and sustainable cities and communities' performance. In Smart Cities and Smart Spaces: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 265-295). IGI Global.
60. Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a “sustainability business model”. Organization & environment, 21(2), 103-127.
61. Szarowská, I. (2017). Does public R&D expenditure matter for economic growth?. Journal of international studies, 10(2).
62. United Nations (2015b). Habitat III issue papers, 21 – Smart cities. V. 2.0 (31 May 2015), issued in New York, USA, by UN task team on Habitat III, a task force of UN agencies and programs for the New Urban Agenda, prepared for Habitat III United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development to take place in Quito, Ecuador, 17–20 October 2016.
63. Wolfers, J. (2003). Is business cycle volatility costly? Evidence from surveys of subjective well‐being. International finance, 6(1), 1-26.
64. Zott, C., Amit, R., and Massa, L. (2011) The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37, 4, 1019–1042.